anilkumar0902
08-27 09:14 AM
When rules and details aren't so clear...it always helps to take legal advice. Ms.Murthy has given her opinion and it seems logical to me. One other thing that isn't clear is the length of "reasonable duration" as mentioned in her letter. It isn't clear anyways and some believe it is 6 months...some 1 year. Some folks believe that it might become an issue while applying for Citizenship..Again..it isn't very clear.
Bottom line...follow legal advice ..It is better to be safe than sorry.
Bottom line...follow legal advice ..It is better to be safe than sorry.
wallpaper hair Cake Pops Wedding Cake.
abq_gc
09-28 12:53 PM
Hello,
Here are my questions:
1) If I decide to work part time for another employer on my EAD card, does it mean that my H1-B with my current employer is invalidated ? Do I have to work for my current employer also on EAD card if I use it to work for some other employer? What other limitations do I have on EAD card ?
1a) Can I work for my present employer on H1-B and another employer at the same time on EAD card ?
2) Can I open my own company on EAD card and work for it ?
3) If I do work on EAD card, then will I absolutely need AP, to travel outside the country ?
4) For AC21, is it 180 days from Received date or Notice date ? If I do invoke AC21 after 180 days, do I have to return to my present sponsoring employer, when the I-485 application is being approved by USCIS ? Any other considerations that I will need to think about ? Will I need to inform the USCIS about my job change, and if yes, when is the right time in the process to do it ?
4a) Can I invoke AC21 while on EAD?
4b) Can I invoke AC21 while on H1-B ? If I can do this, will this simply be a H1-B transfer case ?
5) What can be the accepted change in salary ? Is 40-50% increase in salary ok ?
Thank you,
Abqgc
Here are my questions:
1) If I decide to work part time for another employer on my EAD card, does it mean that my H1-B with my current employer is invalidated ? Do I have to work for my current employer also on EAD card if I use it to work for some other employer? What other limitations do I have on EAD card ?
1a) Can I work for my present employer on H1-B and another employer at the same time on EAD card ?
2) Can I open my own company on EAD card and work for it ?
3) If I do work on EAD card, then will I absolutely need AP, to travel outside the country ?
4) For AC21, is it 180 days from Received date or Notice date ? If I do invoke AC21 after 180 days, do I have to return to my present sponsoring employer, when the I-485 application is being approved by USCIS ? Any other considerations that I will need to think about ? Will I need to inform the USCIS about my job change, and if yes, when is the right time in the process to do it ?
4a) Can I invoke AC21 while on EAD?
4b) Can I invoke AC21 while on H1-B ? If I can do this, will this simply be a H1-B transfer case ?
5) What can be the accepted change in salary ? Is 40-50% increase in salary ok ?
Thank you,
Abqgc
centaur
04-15 09:20 AM
He is not on committee in 110 congress, morever republicans are not calling shots in 110 congress.
The much sought after de-coupling of LEGAL immigration from ILLEGAL immigration has come in the form of the SKIL bill by Sen. Cornyn and S.1092 by Sen. Hagel. This was needed for anything to happen this year, since CIR is a solution to 'political' problem of Illegal immigration, not a 'immigration ' solution to Legal immigration. Now, someone from the House of Representatives needs to push a bill. And then IV needs to apply skull crushing pressure to move both those. As, far as I remember, last year in the 109th. congress Pep. John Shadegg (R) from Arizona, had submitted a House version of the SKIL bill, but had contented that anything might not move, because of Rep. Sensenbrenner. We need to approach him, again to submit a House version of SKIL, for anything happen this year.
The much sought after de-coupling of LEGAL immigration from ILLEGAL immigration has come in the form of the SKIL bill by Sen. Cornyn and S.1092 by Sen. Hagel. This was needed for anything to happen this year, since CIR is a solution to 'political' problem of Illegal immigration, not a 'immigration ' solution to Legal immigration. Now, someone from the House of Representatives needs to push a bill. And then IV needs to apply skull crushing pressure to move both those. As, far as I remember, last year in the 109th. congress Pep. John Shadegg (R) from Arizona, had submitted a House version of the SKIL bill, but had contented that anything might not move, because of Rep. Sensenbrenner. We need to approach him, again to submit a House version of SKIL, for anything happen this year.
2011 Baskin Robbins Royal Wedding
JunRN
11-05 04:37 PM
See my signature...on the 92nd day, I got an LUD for an RFE...don't know what it is yet.
more...
natrajs
04-08 01:50 PM
Guys,
I thought hell would freeze over before this day would come, but I actually got �Card Production Ordered� email just now for myself and my wife.
I was waiting for this moment for 5.5 years. I owe a big thanks for all you guys. You guys have been a great help for me and others as well. Thanks!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Now I will pray for all you guys.
Thanks,
VS
Its Been a Long wait, Congrats and Best Wishes
I thought hell would freeze over before this day would come, but I actually got �Card Production Ordered� email just now for myself and my wife.
I was waiting for this moment for 5.5 years. I owe a big thanks for all you guys. You guys have been a great help for me and others as well. Thanks!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Now I will pray for all you guys.
Thanks,
VS
Its Been a Long wait, Congrats and Best Wishes
amsgc
06-21 12:02 AM
Here is the meaning:
2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 (EB India allocations)
------------------------------------
EB1 1,266 2,998 6,336 3,156 2,855
EB2 8,536 16,262 16,687 3,720 6,203
EB3 10,647 19,889 23,250 3,006 17,795
It means EB2-India was screwed over in 2006 and 2007. Those excess numbers went to EB3ROW which should have gone to EB2-India/China.
"Mr. Oppenheim explained that while the Visa Office initially took the view that visa numbers had to fall down into employment third preference before the could fall across to the individual country quotas, but after further review, additional legislation, and consultation with Congress, they concluded that they have to allocate the fall across within individual preference petitions first."
Could some one explain the meaning. I could not comprehend this statement
2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 (EB India allocations)
------------------------------------
EB1 1,266 2,998 6,336 3,156 2,855
EB2 8,536 16,262 16,687 3,720 6,203
EB3 10,647 19,889 23,250 3,006 17,795
It means EB2-India was screwed over in 2006 and 2007. Those excess numbers went to EB3ROW which should have gone to EB2-India/China.
"Mr. Oppenheim explained that while the Visa Office initially took the view that visa numbers had to fall down into employment third preference before the could fall across to the individual country quotas, but after further review, additional legislation, and consultation with Congress, they concluded that they have to allocate the fall across within individual preference petitions first."
Could some one explain the meaning. I could not comprehend this statement
more...
reddymjm
12-20 12:00 PM
To whoever gave me "red" for saying "stupid thread":
huh? how is this stupid?!
it is a relevant question for a genuine concern, and in time of emergency, I am counting on IV community for their ideas based on experiences.
Happy Holidays to you as well!
I gave u a green.
huh? how is this stupid?!
it is a relevant question for a genuine concern, and in time of emergency, I am counting on IV community for their ideas based on experiences.
Happy Holidays to you as well!
I gave u a green.
2010 the royal wedding cake 2011.
sreedhar
01-14 09:56 AM
Bump
Hello Bump....Will you please let me know what is meaning of Bump...?
Hello Bump....Will you please let me know what is meaning of Bump...?
more...
lostinbeta
09-14 06:12 PM
Well I was hoping for a little more maturity than that, but I guess that is what I get. That site is not all "p0rn", there are just some things on there that are questionable(?). It is his right to put what he wants on his site though so I am not going to argue it. I still think his pixel art is amazing, especially the eCities.
hair Royal Wedding Cake Designer
insbaby
10-06 12:53 PM
This is verry pertinent. If you both are working on EAD , you are no longer on H1. How can the baby come back on H4?
If you really need your wife to go to India, I suggest taking opinion with attorney, since the ability for the baby to come back might be an issue.
Aahhhh. My bad. I am a stuipd.
Sorry. Let me correct it in my post.
If you really need your wife to go to India, I suggest taking opinion with attorney, since the ability for the baby to come back might be an issue.
Aahhhh. My bad. I am a stuipd.
Sorry. Let me correct it in my post.
more...
Jaime
08-01 12:05 PM
Hilarious and true
hot Royal Wedding 2011 cake Art
GCeffect
08-23 03:20 PM
I understand the issue. but the problem is I'll out in vacation from third week of sep to third week of oct 2010. Just wondering everything will be ifne or not? I know that the PD is not current and I just applied for the EAD renewal.
Anyone have any advise or suggestions......
Thanks in advance
Anyone have any advise or suggestions......
Thanks in advance
more...
house Four wedding cakes fit for a
gconmymind
04-02 07:29 PM
This list seems about right to me. I was checking earlier if Economics goes into Math but it does not either.
My personal opinion is that Accounting & Finance or Economics are not part of Math. Pure Math deals mainly with Algorithms and their application. Advanced Math has Fourier Transforms, other advanced calculus, physics, etc. is also involved. Basically, try to think of it as Bachelor of Commerce vs. Bachelor of Science (Mathematics). Both are fundamentally different. I am not saying one is better than the other, that is to one's personal liking, but both are different.
Whether an Advanced degree in Accounting/Finance/Economics should be equated on par with an Advanced degree in Math for OPT purpose - I am not sure.
But all Master's students should be allowed a better chance at the H1 lottery. Otherwise, the students will just go somewhere else and US will lose the talent and the economic value of future students...
My 2 cents...if its even worth that...
My personal opinion is that Accounting & Finance or Economics are not part of Math. Pure Math deals mainly with Algorithms and their application. Advanced Math has Fourier Transforms, other advanced calculus, physics, etc. is also involved. Basically, try to think of it as Bachelor of Commerce vs. Bachelor of Science (Mathematics). Both are fundamentally different. I am not saying one is better than the other, that is to one's personal liking, but both are different.
Whether an Advanced degree in Accounting/Finance/Economics should be equated on par with an Advanced degree in Math for OPT purpose - I am not sure.
But all Master's students should be allowed a better chance at the H1 lottery. Otherwise, the students will just go somewhere else and US will lose the talent and the economic value of future students...
My 2 cents...if its even worth that...
tattoo The Royal Wedding,
mihird
06-20 08:35 AM
As long as the old employer does not withdraw the I-140 or use your approved labor for someone else, your PD will port with you...
Bottom line, if you leave your old employer on good terms, you should be able to port the PD with you..
Dude, the very first time my labor was filed was way back in 2001....I got laid off in mid 2005 with that labor still pending - no reply from DOL...after 5 years with that company, all I got was a lost PD....because I didn't have an approved I140 with them...that's what my new company's lawyer told me...had my labor come through, and I would have had an approved I140, the 2001 PD would have ported with me...
New company filed labor in early 2006, got labor in 2 months...company filed I-140 in May 2006, got I-140 in June 2006. Now it would a bit less painful to sit in the 485 retrogression, since it is less likely I will lose my PD anymore...and plus, I will get a 3 year H1 extension past the 6th year which I will hit in 2007.
There is indeed a silver lining to this dark cloud called the GC...
Bottom line, if you leave your old employer on good terms, you should be able to port the PD with you..
Dude, the very first time my labor was filed was way back in 2001....I got laid off in mid 2005 with that labor still pending - no reply from DOL...after 5 years with that company, all I got was a lost PD....because I didn't have an approved I140 with them...that's what my new company's lawyer told me...had my labor come through, and I would have had an approved I140, the 2001 PD would have ported with me...
New company filed labor in early 2006, got labor in 2 months...company filed I-140 in May 2006, got I-140 in June 2006. Now it would a bit less painful to sit in the 485 retrogression, since it is less likely I will lose my PD anymore...and plus, I will get a 3 year H1 extension past the 6th year which I will hit in 2007.
There is indeed a silver lining to this dark cloud called the GC...
more...
pictures royal wedding cake 2011. royal wedding cake designs.
grupak
02-07 02:39 PM
We need everyone in the community to step up and cooperate in this effort. For the next 3 weeks, please concentrate on this effort.
Our careers and our future is in our hands and we cannot allow things to slip away. We must use every opportunity we have to.
Please pledge on this thread that you are actively pursing this campaign
Keep motivating others chanduv23!
Our careers and our future is in our hands and we cannot allow things to slip away. We must use every opportunity we have to.
Please pledge on this thread that you are actively pursing this campaign
Keep motivating others chanduv23!
dresses The Royal Wedding Cake:
maverick_joe
10-29 05:34 PM
me - status - card prod ordered ;EAD received.
My spouse - status - card prod ordered ; EAD not received yet.
Any one in the same boat. I called cust care but they say call after 30 days.
My spouse - status - card prod ordered ; EAD not received yet.
Any one in the same boat. I called cust care but they say call after 30 days.
more...
makeup 2010 royal wedding cake 2011,
OLDMONK
06-11 04:11 PM
Also have an A number but it says explicitly that I am not eligible to apply for adjustment at this time. (priority date Jan-06 EB2 and EB3) :mad:
girlfriend Royal-wedding-2011-official-
QuintonBermuda
05-10 03:09 PM
Take a look and particularly pages 23 - 26...
http://www.whitehouse.gov/sites/default/files/rss_viewer/immigration_blueprint.pdf
:)
http://www.whitehouse.gov/sites/default/files/rss_viewer/immigration_blueprint.pdf
:)
hairstyles royal-wedding-cake-2011
jvsap
05-25 11:03 PM
Hi,
Thanks for your response. I am really worried about RFE. My Employer advised me we need reply them quickly in 1 week so that they feel we are serious.
Mine is BE+5years, applied under EB2 CATEGORY.
My employer advised me create a document which explains the Job Duties and responsibilites etc project by project. I have 9+ years of experience.
Usually my employer will contact attorney directly.
My EMPLOYER is saying
all documnets including resume, experience letters, etc.
Can any body explain me what exactly uscis is expecting from me , what kind avidence they are expecting in RFE ?
RFE Reason says:
Please provide documents such as position descriptions, the percentage of time spent on the various duties, organizational charts, and payroll records demonstarting that the qualifying experience gained by the alien while working for the employer, including as a contract employee, was ina position not substantially, i.e., not requiring performance of the same job duties more than 50 percent of the time to the position for which certification is being sought, and/or documents demonstarting that it is no longer feasible to train a worker to qualify for the position.
Thanks
jvsap
Thanks for your response. I am really worried about RFE. My Employer advised me we need reply them quickly in 1 week so that they feel we are serious.
Mine is BE+5years, applied under EB2 CATEGORY.
My employer advised me create a document which explains the Job Duties and responsibilites etc project by project. I have 9+ years of experience.
Usually my employer will contact attorney directly.
My EMPLOYER is saying
all documnets including resume, experience letters, etc.
Can any body explain me what exactly uscis is expecting from me , what kind avidence they are expecting in RFE ?
RFE Reason says:
Please provide documents such as position descriptions, the percentage of time spent on the various duties, organizational charts, and payroll records demonstarting that the qualifying experience gained by the alien while working for the employer, including as a contract employee, was ina position not substantially, i.e., not requiring performance of the same job duties more than 50 percent of the time to the position for which certification is being sought, and/or documents demonstarting that it is no longer feasible to train a worker to qualify for the position.
Thanks
jvsap
Sakthisagar
06-17 09:33 AM
There are rumous only about the S.1085. democrats are trying to push that as a peice meal relief. along with Dream act and Agjobs amendments.
S. 1085, section 2 of which provides for the recapture of unused employment-based visas and family-sponsored visas from fiscal years 1992-2007. For future fiscal years, unused visa numbers will �roll over� to the next fiscal year. To reduce current backlogs, this section exempts immediate relatives from the cap on the number of immigrant visas.
Why there is only taking away per country visa limits for EB-2 it is for all EB-categories. EB-2 does not enjoy a special privilage with regards to per country visa limits
S. 1085, section 2 of which provides for the recapture of unused employment-based visas and family-sponsored visas from fiscal years 1992-2007. For future fiscal years, unused visa numbers will �roll over� to the next fiscal year. To reduce current backlogs, this section exempts immediate relatives from the cap on the number of immigrant visas.
Why there is only taking away per country visa limits for EB-2 it is for all EB-categories. EB-2 does not enjoy a special privilage with regards to per country visa limits
sanjay02
01-09 06:21 PM
I got an RFE for a2p as well and they asked for my payslips. My lawyer handled it well. The total time for approval was 18months from the time I-140 was applied.
No comments:
Post a Comment