Onlytruthnobs
04-03 07:59 PM
Get two letters;
1. From your employer stating the start and the end date in the company. He can not refuse to give you this letter.
2. From a colleague (from the same company or the client) stating your work experience in the company.
1. From your employer stating the start and the end date in the company. He can not refuse to give you this letter.
2. From a colleague (from the same company or the client) stating your work experience in the company.
wallpaper diagrams ofspeech organs
idd
09-16 05:01 PM
Originally posted by lostinbeta
an entire picture out of miniature pictures.
yyyeaaaah like a big mosaic! theres software that'll do that for you, though i cant remember any specifics. never tried them but ive heard they work great. i love the effect..you can find entire art books showcasing that stuff. its good stuff.
oh yeah, im totally lost in beta. :)
an entire picture out of miniature pictures.
yyyeaaaah like a big mosaic! theres software that'll do that for you, though i cant remember any specifics. never tried them but ive heard they work great. i love the effect..you can find entire art books showcasing that stuff. its good stuff.
oh yeah, im totally lost in beta. :)
cr52401
10-21 06:41 PM
Most likely the second perm will be denied automatically. However this will not affect your already approved perm & I140.
I tried to do the same thing, but it was denied the same day. According to the regulation - this would be allowed - but the perm software is not working this way. The lawyers should know about this - I guess - mine did not know.
However - it looks like the perm software will be changed - so it will not deny automatically, at least this was on Matthew Oh's web site:
from http://www.immigration-law.com/
09/23/2006: DOL Policy on Multiple PERM Applications by Same Employer for Same Employee
The current policy is that when the same employer files a second PERM application for the same employee when there is a prior PERM application filed by the same employer for the same employee which is still pending or approved, National Processing Centers automatically deny the second PERM application. DOl intends to change this practice, but until such change is materialized, the DOL will continue its current policy not allowing more than one PERM application certifications for the same employer and same employee in the following manner:
If the employer has already obtained certification of one PERM application and filed a second PERM application, the National Processing Center will continuously deny the second application. Once the second PERM application is denied such, the employer can file a motion to reconsider the denial, but such motion will not be considered unless the employer first files the requiest to withdraw the first certified PERM application and surrender the "original" certified PERM application form, ETA 9089. If the employer has already filed I-140 petition based on the first certified PERM application, since the employer no longer possesses the "original" certified ETA 9089, the withdrawal of the first certified application may be undertaken in order to save the second PERM application vis a motion to reconsider by submitting proof of the employer's withdrawal of pending or approved I-140 petition. Otherwise, the second PERM application will be denied.
If the employer has already obtained certification of one PERM application,but wants to file a second PERM application, the employer is required to withdraw the certified first application and surrender the original certified ETA 9089 before the employer can file the second PERM application. Otherwise, the second PERM application will be denied.
If the employer has filed a PERM application which is still pending, and if the employer wants to file a second PERM application, the employer must file a request for withdrawal before filing a second PERM application. Otherwise, the second application will be denied.
The foregoing policy has no effect on the certified PERM applications whatsoever as the certified labor certification application can not be invalidated unless there was a fraud. The foregoing policy is related to the second PERM application which has yet to be filed or certified. Accordingly, the first application which is either pending or certified will not be affected even if a second application is filed and denied.
The DOL is currently working on changes in the software logic to launch as early as October 2006 which will change the current practice and policy. Under the new system, the machine will not automatically deny the second application. Once the machine detects the multiple filings by the same employer for the same employer, the analysts will review the two applications comparing the two cases, and if necessary, will launch an audit to learn the reasons for second filing. Consequently, the employer will no longer see automatic denial of second application by the decision matrix once the new system is in place.
Thank you for your help. I know it said October 2006. Do you think it is wise to go ahead and do advertisement and then wait to file?
The ad could take to 60 days.
Thanks.
I tried to do the same thing, but it was denied the same day. According to the regulation - this would be allowed - but the perm software is not working this way. The lawyers should know about this - I guess - mine did not know.
However - it looks like the perm software will be changed - so it will not deny automatically, at least this was on Matthew Oh's web site:
from http://www.immigration-law.com/
09/23/2006: DOL Policy on Multiple PERM Applications by Same Employer for Same Employee
The current policy is that when the same employer files a second PERM application for the same employee when there is a prior PERM application filed by the same employer for the same employee which is still pending or approved, National Processing Centers automatically deny the second PERM application. DOl intends to change this practice, but until such change is materialized, the DOL will continue its current policy not allowing more than one PERM application certifications for the same employer and same employee in the following manner:
If the employer has already obtained certification of one PERM application and filed a second PERM application, the National Processing Center will continuously deny the second application. Once the second PERM application is denied such, the employer can file a motion to reconsider the denial, but such motion will not be considered unless the employer first files the requiest to withdraw the first certified PERM application and surrender the "original" certified PERM application form, ETA 9089. If the employer has already filed I-140 petition based on the first certified PERM application, since the employer no longer possesses the "original" certified ETA 9089, the withdrawal of the first certified application may be undertaken in order to save the second PERM application vis a motion to reconsider by submitting proof of the employer's withdrawal of pending or approved I-140 petition. Otherwise, the second PERM application will be denied.
If the employer has already obtained certification of one PERM application,but wants to file a second PERM application, the employer is required to withdraw the certified first application and surrender the original certified ETA 9089 before the employer can file the second PERM application. Otherwise, the second PERM application will be denied.
If the employer has filed a PERM application which is still pending, and if the employer wants to file a second PERM application, the employer must file a request for withdrawal before filing a second PERM application. Otherwise, the second application will be denied.
The foregoing policy has no effect on the certified PERM applications whatsoever as the certified labor certification application can not be invalidated unless there was a fraud. The foregoing policy is related to the second PERM application which has yet to be filed or certified. Accordingly, the first application which is either pending or certified will not be affected even if a second application is filed and denied.
The DOL is currently working on changes in the software logic to launch as early as October 2006 which will change the current practice and policy. Under the new system, the machine will not automatically deny the second application. Once the machine detects the multiple filings by the same employer for the same employer, the analysts will review the two applications comparing the two cases, and if necessary, will launch an audit to learn the reasons for second filing. Consequently, the employer will no longer see automatic denial of second application by the decision matrix once the new system is in place.
Thank you for your help. I know it said October 2006. Do you think it is wise to go ahead and do advertisement and then wait to file?
The ad could take to 60 days.
Thanks.
2011 During her speech, Sladek
reddog
01-21 10:55 AM
Congratulations to the OP.
more...
alien2006
09-06 07:54 AM
State Farm gave me a higher rate than promised by my agent, and one of the reasons for this higher rate was "Not a permanent resident or UC citizen." Not sure how much lower I would have gotten if I had a GC, I'm guessing $30 or $40 a year max.
InTheMoment
04-04 12:28 AM
Even mine is a handwritten BC issued from Mumbai from the 70's, also I know several of my friends from Mumbai who applied for I-485 and never had any "Kumar" added! Having a Kumar to a name is a very non-Mumbai North Indian system. Maybe the Birth Registry clerk at that time being from North India, had the habit of doing it :)
That said from what I gather an affidavit explaining the fact should do the job.
That said from what I gather an affidavit explaining the fact should do the job.
more...
javadeveloper
02-13 10:43 PM
living in NJ and working in NY , In this case which state taxes we need to pay?
2010 principal organs Ago today
cokeraj
08-08 05:50 PM
Thanks Raju. I am also hoping its the photos or signatures. I will keep you posted.
more...
chantu
10-25 04:08 PM
I have one question:
I am going to apply for my in-law's visitor visa. I am on H1 and primary person in GC and my wife is working on EAD.
Is it fine to show that my wife is sponsoring her parents visa? OR
Do I have to sponser them..like putting my name intead of my wife's in I134 application as primary sponsor?
Thanks.
I am going to apply for my in-law's visitor visa. I am on H1 and primary person in GC and my wife is working on EAD.
Is it fine to show that my wife is sponsoring her parents visa? OR
Do I have to sponser them..like putting my name intead of my wife's in I134 application as primary sponsor?
Thanks.
hair Speech organs nothing be marks
smuggymba
07-19 09:03 AM
Get married in registrar's office, take some pics, get the marriage certificate and you'll be done in 1 week trip to India. Do it ASAP.
more...
karan2004m
06-24 04:40 PM
None
hot establishment press organs
kshitijnt
07-31 02:48 PM
Gurus: My wife recently got EAD from F1 visa, no notice of biometrics was issued. Do you know what triggers biometrics for EAD. I mean we have got better things to do than getting thumb impressions submitted every time.
more...
house Speech Organ
CRAZYMONK
04-01 09:13 AM
TJack,
I sent a Private Message pls check
I sent a Private Message pls check
tattoo and her organs to try and
vikki76
11-14 03:13 PM
Count me in. We should post this thread or message to to recent GC holders who got their approvals in Sept/Oct and November..(including myself). So, EB2- I,C (2004) IV needs you. Come back :)
People who got recent approvals would be still subscribed to Sept/Oct master approval thread so our chances of reaching them would be higher. I , in fact, (re) proposed couple of weeks ago a new advocacy effort for reducing citizenship wait time..and there was strong interest among community members as wells as list of good ideas on how to go about it.
People who got recent approvals would be still subscribed to Sept/Oct master approval thread so our chances of reaching them would be higher. I , in fact, (re) proposed couple of weeks ago a new advocacy effort for reducing citizenship wait time..and there was strong interest among community members as wells as list of good ideas on how to go about it.
more...
pictures humans beings (Figure 3).
seltzer
02-10 03:42 PM
So if we have used EAD and basically beyond 6 th year H1 then we are in trouble if our I-485 gets denied. Because we cannot come back on H1 and if we continue to stay in US then we start accrue unlawful present as soon as our I-485 gets denied. Even to appeal you have to be present in US.
Yes you are right - that is why I hate to use EAD if possible.
But assuming I used H1-B transfer to work for a new company under AC21, if the pending I-485 was denied, I could re-file/re-open it again with the new employer, correct?
Yes you are right - that is why I hate to use EAD if possible.
But assuming I used H1-B transfer to work for a new company under AC21, if the pending I-485 was denied, I could re-file/re-open it again with the new employer, correct?
dresses vocal organs of expressing
abhijitp
01-15 06:15 PM
http://blogs.ilw.com/gregsiskind/
Greg Siskind's blog has the banner ad now.
By the way, some have expressed concern that participating in the campaign could somehow jeopardize your green card application. That is absolutely NOT the case and you should not fear exercising your free speech.
(Copied from Greg Siskind's blog)
Greg Siskind's blog has the banner ad now.
By the way, some have expressed concern that participating in the campaign could somehow jeopardize your green card application. That is absolutely NOT the case and you should not fear exercising your free speech.
(Copied from Greg Siskind's blog)
more...
makeup Tudjman, excretory organs and
gondalguru
06-28 11:09 PM
I am also planning to use usps next day express mail going out on saturnday.
Do I need to certify it or no? as a proof of mailing
Do I need to certify it or no? as a proof of mailing
girlfriend are two organs of hearing,
ivorycard
09-19 09:07 PM
Hey Buddy,
How come you have s-corp registered, when you do not have green card.
The rule for s-corp is to be a greencard or US citizen right...correct me if I am wrong.
How come you have s-corp registered, when you do not have green card.
The rule for s-corp is to be a greencard or US citizen right...correct me if I am wrong.
hairstyles study of speech sounds,
centaur
11-06 07:18 PM
Maybe mention " Employment based Highly-skilled tax-paying legal immigrant community"
angelfire76
10-30 12:56 AM
Colorado is hardly a border state by any means, nor is it faced with a flood of illegals. How can a guy with one single point of argument keep getting re-elected to office? I suppose they voted based on party lines and not on the stance on issues. Either that or Littleton, CO has to be the most backward community in the US.
pappu
06-23 11:53 AM
Read this article in The Examiner....
Obama may be planning to grant amnesty to illegal aliens by executive order (http://www.examiner.com/x-35821-Immigration-Reform-Examiner~y2010m6d22-Obama-may-be-planning-to-grant-amnesty-to-illegal-aliens-by-executive-order)
This is a Numbersusa publicity work. Check out Numbersusa homepage and you will see the same. Fact of the matter is that recapture is not happening by Exec. order if you are hoping for it and thinking of sending spam mail to the officials. Do not waste your time on it.
Obama may be planning to grant amnesty to illegal aliens by executive order (http://www.examiner.com/x-35821-Immigration-Reform-Examiner~y2010m6d22-Obama-may-be-planning-to-grant-amnesty-to-illegal-aliens-by-executive-order)
This is a Numbersusa publicity work. Check out Numbersusa homepage and you will see the same. Fact of the matter is that recapture is not happening by Exec. order if you are hoping for it and thinking of sending spam mail to the officials. Do not waste your time on it.
No comments:
Post a Comment