loudobbs
07-23 02:09 PM
I called customer service a liitle while ago. The lady eas very polite. She escalated the request to a senior rep who was very polite too.
I guess people can have bad days too.:) :)
It is not easy to fire such people. It is very easy to fire the good ones. In general, if they are rude to you when they are not supposed to be, they may basically have some kind of supporrt to behave that way.
I guess people can have bad days too.:) :)
It is not easy to fire such people. It is very easy to fire the good ones. In general, if they are rude to you when they are not supposed to be, they may basically have some kind of supporrt to behave that way.
wallpaper Chanel and the designer
pkon
09-21 12:08 AM
We just received our receipt from USCIS two days ago. Our papers reached on July 13th and our receipt date is Sep 10th. As usual, there is no order in which the process applications. Just hang in there. Good luck to all.
naagarajan
07-10 09:42 AM
I am located in Dallas with I-140 approved. Since my project is ending in Dallas, I have found another job with the same company in Chicago.
But my HR and the Layer is saying that, if I move to Chicago then I have to re-do whole process again starting from labor.
Could some one let me know if they are correct? What will happen If I change the location without refiling labor?
But my HR and the Layer is saying that, if I move to Chicago then I have to re-do whole process again starting from labor.
Could some one let me know if they are correct? What will happen If I change the location without refiling labor?
2011 Baptiste Giabiconi
pjalan
04-02 06:10 AM
You can do both and should do both
more...
andres
04-15 05:24 PM
:)

manderson
03-08 10:23 AM
can you send a link (YouTube perhaps)?
A reputed local channel is producing a documentary on the contributions of the immigrants to the economy and the difficulties they have to face and have to overcome to survive here and Highly Skilled Legal Immigrant group will be one of the three groups they will be focusing on. Pdakwala one of the co founders of IV has been working with the channel to make sure that there is coverage of the challenges we the Highly Skilled Legal Immigrants are facing due to the present outdated immigration process.
My wife and me both Highly Skilled Legal Immigrants will be a part of this documentary. What I intend to do is ....to send a detailed document to the producers mentioning three points so that they have a clear understanding of the contributions we make and the issues we are facing
1. The economic and cultural contributions the HSLI's make.
2. The Competitive advantage this country will lose if it does not make immediate amendments to the broken Immigration process.
3. Debunk some myths such as H1's dont pay tax, H1's take away jobs etc
I know I can find sufficient information if I browse through the various threads of IV but I am posting this for two reasons
1. I want input in terms of how to eloberate this specially point 2 and point 3
2. Constrain of time -- I need to send out the information like ...yesterday ;)
A reputed local channel is producing a documentary on the contributions of the immigrants to the economy and the difficulties they have to face and have to overcome to survive here and Highly Skilled Legal Immigrant group will be one of the three groups they will be focusing on. Pdakwala one of the co founders of IV has been working with the channel to make sure that there is coverage of the challenges we the Highly Skilled Legal Immigrants are facing due to the present outdated immigration process.
My wife and me both Highly Skilled Legal Immigrants will be a part of this documentary. What I intend to do is ....to send a detailed document to the producers mentioning three points so that they have a clear understanding of the contributions we make and the issues we are facing
1. The economic and cultural contributions the HSLI's make.
2. The Competitive advantage this country will lose if it does not make immediate amendments to the broken Immigration process.
3. Debunk some myths such as H1's dont pay tax, H1's take away jobs etc
I know I can find sufficient information if I browse through the various threads of IV but I am posting this for two reasons
1. I want input in terms of how to eloberate this specially point 2 and point 3
2. Constrain of time -- I need to send out the information like ...yesterday ;)
more...
ameryki
06-19 04:28 PM
as far as I know that vaccination is not a requirement
2010 then Baptiste Giabiconi
Widget
07-07 06:17 PM
It means that you will get your approval notice very soon.
Mine had a RD of May 1 too at NSC. I checked the status for the first two weeks and it said it would be approved in 150-180 days. Now it just says that it is being processed, without any mention of the days it might take.
Mine had a RD of May 1 too at NSC. I checked the status for the first two weeks and it said it would be approved in 150-180 days. Now it just says that it is being processed, without any mention of the days it might take.
more...
satishku_2000
08-23 10:06 PM
Its interesting!! As far as I know, our lawyer didnt apply for EAD/AP, but today we got the EAD card by post directly to our mailbox.
I don't know whats going with INS, but we are pleasantly surprised!! Does anyone else got this EAD?
Also my name is not complete on the EAD(one of those poor guys with a loooong name), will that be a problem?
on the lighterside you would have a less problem in namecheck i guess , If you have an uncommon name and a longname, you should get out of name check rather quickly I guess ... :)
I don't know whats going with INS, but we are pleasantly surprised!! Does anyone else got this EAD?
Also my name is not complete on the EAD(one of those poor guys with a loooong name), will that be a problem?
on the lighterside you would have a less problem in namecheck i guess , If you have an uncommon name and a longname, you should get out of name check rather quickly I guess ... :)
hair on Baptiste Giabiconi,
brij523
12-28 04:35 PM
Hi Caydee,
Nice to hear that. Another 48 states to go.
Caydee, I was thinking to modify the letter in the beginning of the post.
PM me. Lets get connected. And plan a strategy.
Thanks
Nice to hear that. Another 48 states to go.
Caydee, I was thinking to modify the letter in the beginning of the post.
PM me. Lets get connected. And plan a strategy.
Thanks
more...
ram04
09-08 02:41 PM
As per my lawyer it should not be issue if you have H 4 and renewing AP as and when she is here. I have send PM to you with all details.
I am in the same boat as you are and following same thing.
- Ram
I am in the same boat as you are and following same thing.
- Ram
hot Baptiste Giabiconi
amitjoey
02-19 11:27 AM
That is the cost to the members- (buyers of services- In paypal terminology).
I do not know what the cost is to IV (Which is seller of services- In paypal terminology).
I do not know what the cost is to IV (Which is seller of services- In paypal terminology).
more...
house Baptiste+giabiconi+gay
learning01
02-18 03:38 PM
You must realize that things are progressing darn well for H1Bs. You will admit that these are temporary employment visas. Now there is a 7th year extension. There is AC 21 portability. Seeing the skills, talent and productivity of these H1Bs, universities and employers are sponsoring for GCs.
Making more visa numbers available for H1Bs is the issue on hand. Concurrent filing of 140 and 485 is the other issueThat is what I said in my earlier reply to you. I said concentrate on a cream of issues affecting H1Bs. Let's not make esoteric demands, like, your raising LC subs (many holes in that. first and foremost, objectivity - provide a link, then the issue's reliability and its suitability to puruse now, when it is sunsetting in a few weeks). I encourage all persons affected by retrogression to come together, organize and act for a set of common goals.
There are set of government rules and laws. The best and most influential entity that can affect these rules are the end users of H1Bs; top coporations and universities. Immiration Voice should write to them to come to resolve the retrogression issues. I fully agree with IVs approach of hiring a consultant and meeting congressmen and senators.
Making more visa numbers available for H1Bs is the issue on hand. Concurrent filing of 140 and 485 is the other issueThat is what I said in my earlier reply to you. I said concentrate on a cream of issues affecting H1Bs. Let's not make esoteric demands, like, your raising LC subs (many holes in that. first and foremost, objectivity - provide a link, then the issue's reliability and its suitability to puruse now, when it is sunsetting in a few weeks). I encourage all persons affected by retrogression to come together, organize and act for a set of common goals.
There are set of government rules and laws. The best and most influential entity that can affect these rules are the end users of H1Bs; top coporations and universities. Immiration Voice should write to them to come to resolve the retrogression issues. I fully agree with IVs approach of hiring a consultant and meeting congressmen and senators.
tattoo You can see more of Baptiste
SK2007
04-24 10:11 AM
Friends, if I already have an EB3 application pending for April 2006 PD and my friend is willing to file EB2 application while I continue to work on EB3 with present employer will my current employer find out ?
My current employer has refused to give me copy of I-140. I only know the receipt# LIN... for my I-140. Can I use this to port my priority date from EB3 to EB2. I want to be able to port my dates and file a new EB2 labour without my current employer finding out - possible or not ??
In my case will the EB2 filed now take longer than EB3 filed in April 2006 priority date ? Is it even worth it ?
In the normal situation, I thoink you can port the date only while filing 485, for this you need to have both of your I-140s approved. In you case you are already on EAD, if I am not wrong you should still be able to port dates, after your both I140s are approved not just based on mere application.
My current employer has refused to give me copy of I-140. I only know the receipt# LIN... for my I-140. Can I use this to port my priority date from EB3 to EB2. I want to be able to port my dates and file a new EB2 labour without my current employer finding out - possible or not ??
In my case will the EB2 filed now take longer than EB3 filed in April 2006 priority date ? Is it even worth it ?
In the normal situation, I thoink you can port the date only while filing 485, for this you need to have both of your I-140s approved. In you case you are already on EAD, if I am not wrong you should still be able to port dates, after your both I140s are approved not just based on mere application.
more...
pictures Baptiste for Armani Jeans Look
immidude
07-19 10:43 AM
I see in IV web site we need to make checks payable to
'United States Citizenship and Immigration Service'
but i got diffrent info from my employer that i need to make it payble to
Department of Home land security
which one is correct?
'United States Citizenship and Immigration Service'
but i got diffrent info from my employer that i need to make it payble to
Department of Home land security
which one is correct?
dresses Baptiste Giabiconi | Flickr - Photo Sharing!
chil3
03-16 10:21 PM
We will have lesser pain If we think as if we are living in some middle east country where no immigrant gets citizenship I believe ...they just keep issuing visa after every two years.
Thinking they will do something in favor of legal immigrants seems almost impossible in this economic situation. That too when they are not letting pass healthcare bill which possibly could be beneficial for Americans.
I have less pain now when I think I am in mid east with more freedom...I have to keep renewing EAD & any moment of time I could be denied and go back to own country..
GC wait is endless ...at least for EB3
Thinking they will do something in favor of legal immigrants seems almost impossible in this economic situation. That too when they are not letting pass healthcare bill which possibly could be beneficial for Americans.
I have less pain now when I think I am in mid east with more freedom...I have to keep renewing EAD & any moment of time I could be denied and go back to own country..
GC wait is endless ...at least for EB3
more...
makeup Baptiste Giabiconi Wikipedia
blacktongue
05-11 12:49 PM
Your English is perfect.
You bet
You bet
girlfriend Baptiste Giabiconi star in
ivuser
02-08 10:06 AM
Hi,
There is a chance you may get extension of stay (new I 94), please note that the process is not certain.
I did not get extension approval for my parents.
Let us say for an example, my parents came to US on 01 Jan 2003 with a 10 years visa, up on entry they got 6 months approval to stay, that is till June 30 2003. Please note that this visit was the second visit to US, the first was in 2000 for 6 months.
In March 2003 we decided to request for extension of stay, as per conventional knowledge, we should not make the extension request too much in advance, it is recommended to apply 30 days before you permitted stay ends.
Applied extension on 01 June 2003, the USCIS may take 2 to 3 months to process those application. There is a website where you could monitor the status, every day we used to monitor that and found on 10 Aug 2003 stating that the extension is rejected. On 16 Aug 2003 we got a letter stating that extension is rejected and it is out of status now. Please note that there was no clear indication when the out of status time started, it is a big mess. I do know if an application is pending, it is legal and it is in status.
As per the law, if a visitor is out of status even for a day, the 10 years Visitor Visa is invalid, and could have issues for the visitor's GC process.
Only good part is, in most of the cases they do not invalidate the Visa. I have noticed in many cases the visitors had to apply for a new 10 year visitors visa and that was a big mess too.
The reason why I had to write the long reply is to give our IV members a chance to take an informed decision.
My take is, I would not recommend the extension process to any of my friends.
Thanks,
IVuser
There is a chance you may get extension of stay (new I 94), please note that the process is not certain.
I did not get extension approval for my parents.
Let us say for an example, my parents came to US on 01 Jan 2003 with a 10 years visa, up on entry they got 6 months approval to stay, that is till June 30 2003. Please note that this visit was the second visit to US, the first was in 2000 for 6 months.
In March 2003 we decided to request for extension of stay, as per conventional knowledge, we should not make the extension request too much in advance, it is recommended to apply 30 days before you permitted stay ends.
Applied extension on 01 June 2003, the USCIS may take 2 to 3 months to process those application. There is a website where you could monitor the status, every day we used to monitor that and found on 10 Aug 2003 stating that the extension is rejected. On 16 Aug 2003 we got a letter stating that extension is rejected and it is out of status now. Please note that there was no clear indication when the out of status time started, it is a big mess. I do know if an application is pending, it is legal and it is in status.
As per the law, if a visitor is out of status even for a day, the 10 years Visitor Visa is invalid, and could have issues for the visitor's GC process.
Only good part is, in most of the cases they do not invalidate the Visa. I have noticed in many cases the visitors had to apply for a new 10 year visitors visa and that was a big mess too.
The reason why I had to write the long reply is to give our IV members a chance to take an informed decision.
My take is, I would not recommend the extension process to any of my friends.
Thanks,
IVuser
hairstyles aptiste giabiconi
andy_traps
02-20 08:02 PM
FYI -- I received the following Immigration related email from Congressman (CA) Pete Stark's office.
----
The increase in illegal immigration poses many challenges to our communities
and our broken immigration system must be fixed. My colleagues and I who
oppose mass deportations understand that illegal immigrants, by definition,
have broken the law. However, our economy depends on their hard work. The farming, food service, and construction sectors would essentially cease to exist without immigrant workers.
The vast majority of illegal immigrants come here to work. The best way to
control illegal immigration is to strictly enforce laws that require
employers to hire citizens or legal immigrants. First we have to ensure
that our laws allow for sufficient legal workers. The legal immigration
system is relatively generous for family members of citizens, but it is
nearly impossible to immigrate for employment. In 2004, only 359 people
were admitted in the category of "unskilled shortage workers," which is why
so many illegal immigrants come to fill those jobs.
I support legislation similar to the Senate compromise to bring legal
immigration in line with the supply of jobs not taken by citizens. H.R.
2330, the Secure America and Orderly Immigration Act, would create a system
whereby, if a job went unfilled by American citizens, the person who filled
that job would be able to get a temporary visa and, if they kept the job for
a long period, earn legal immigration status. The system would require
criminal background checks and a demonstrated understanding of English and
civics.
Immigration reform was not completed before the end of the 109th Congress,
but will certainly receive renewed focus in the 110th Congress.
Sincerely,
Pete Stark
Member of Congress
----
The increase in illegal immigration poses many challenges to our communities
and our broken immigration system must be fixed. My colleagues and I who
oppose mass deportations understand that illegal immigrants, by definition,
have broken the law. However, our economy depends on their hard work. The farming, food service, and construction sectors would essentially cease to exist without immigrant workers.
The vast majority of illegal immigrants come here to work. The best way to
control illegal immigration is to strictly enforce laws that require
employers to hire citizens or legal immigrants. First we have to ensure
that our laws allow for sufficient legal workers. The legal immigration
system is relatively generous for family members of citizens, but it is
nearly impossible to immigrate for employment. In 2004, only 359 people
were admitted in the category of "unskilled shortage workers," which is why
so many illegal immigrants come to fill those jobs.
I support legislation similar to the Senate compromise to bring legal
immigration in line with the supply of jobs not taken by citizens. H.R.
2330, the Secure America and Orderly Immigration Act, would create a system
whereby, if a job went unfilled by American citizens, the person who filled
that job would be able to get a temporary visa and, if they kept the job for
a long period, earn legal immigration status. The system would require
criminal background checks and a demonstrated understanding of English and
civics.
Immigration reform was not completed before the end of the 109th Congress,
but will certainly receive renewed focus in the 110th Congress.
Sincerely,
Pete Stark
Member of Congress
thatwillbeit
07-24 02:12 PM
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
eb2dec2005
10-02 10:50 AM
Running total $200 (accounted until post #7 of this thread)
If you have contributed, please take a moment to vote the public poll and also write the amount of contribution in this thread.
wandmaker,
By the way,iam not a legal permanent resident yet, but still contributed .
I am stil waiting for GC approval. :)
If you have contributed, please take a moment to vote the public poll and also write the amount of contribution in this thread.
wandmaker,
By the way,iam not a legal permanent resident yet, but still contributed .
I am stil waiting for GC approval. :)

No comments:
Post a Comment